{"id":11713,"date":"2026-08-24T20:05:20","date_gmt":"2026-08-24T20:05:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.raxpanel.com\/?p=11713"},"modified":"2026-08-30T14:13:51","modified_gmt":"2026-08-30T14:13:51","slug":"%d1%82%d0%b5%d1%85%d0%bd%d0%b8%d1%87%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8%d0%b5-%d1%85%d0%b0%d1%80%d0%b0%d0%ba%d1%82%d0%b5%d1%80%d0%b8%d1%81%d1%82%d0%b8%d0%ba%d0%b8-%d0%be%d0%b3%d0%bd%d0%b5%d1%81%d1%82%d0%be%d0%b9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.raxpanel.com\/ru\/blog\/acp-foam-core-panel-fire-rating-technical-specs\/","title":{"rendered":"\u041e\u0433\u043d\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0439\u043a\u043e\u0441\u0442\u044c \u043f\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043b\u0438 \u0441 \u043f\u0435\u043d\u043e\u043f\u043b\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e\u0432\u044b\u043c \u0441\u0435\u0440\u0434\u0435\u0447\u043d\u0438\u043a\u043e\u043c ACP | \u0422\u0435\u0445\u043d\u0438\u0447\u0435\u0441\u043a\u0438\u0435 \u0445\u0430\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0435\u0440\u0438\u0441\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0438"},"content":{"rendered":"

Specifying an ACP foam core panel<\/a> fire rating<\/a> without authenticating the test report creates immediate code compliance risks. Most procurement teams focus on unit cost, yet a single non-compliant core material can trigger a total project halt. The difference between a B1 and an A2 classification<\/a> is not just a label; it determines if the building remains occupied during a fire event. You need to distinguish between marketing claims and certified safety data.<\/p>\n

While XPS and PET cores<\/a> offer thermal insulation<\/a>, a 50mm enhanced modified foamed cement insulation board core achieves A-grade fire resistance that standard polymer foams cannot match. We review the technical divergence between these core types and demonstrate how to cross-reference foam core material certifications against panel specs. You will leave with a clear method to identify fake certificates and installation detailing errors that compromise fire integrity.<\/p>\n

\"PVC<\/figure>\n

Check Documentation and Materials Before Technical Review<\/h2>\n
\n

Authenticating fire documentation is your first line of defense against catastrophic liability. Never assume a provided PDF implies actual compliance; verify the report number directly with the issuing laboratory.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Verifying Third-Party Fire Test Report Authenticity<\/h3>\n

The market is flooded with sophisticated counterfeit certificates that mimic the layout of reputable labs like T\u00dcV<\/a>, SGS, or Intertek. As a buyer, you must distinguish between a “Test Report” (raw data) and a “Classification Report” (official status). A raw data sheet does not grant a fire rating; it only records what happened during a specific burn. To ensure compliance, you must cross-reference the certificate number on the official website of the testing body. If the document does not appear in their database, or if the issuance date differs from the PDF, the document is void.<\/p>\n

\n\u26a0\ufe0f Critical Pitfall:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Be wary of “valid for X years” claims on generic templates. Valid fire classifications (e.g., EN 13501-1<\/a>) are only valid as long as the product formulation remains unchanged. If a supplier changes their core adhesive supplier, the fire certification is technically invalidated.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

We maintain a rigorous documentation protocol for our international clients. For every batch of Aluminum Composite Panels (ACP) or Foam Core Sandwich Panels<\/a> shipped, we provide the full, unredacted classification report alongside the test lab’s direct verification link. We encourage our B2B partners to audit these documents before the production line starts, ensuring that the “Fire Retardant” label on the purchase order matches the physical reality of the material.<\/p>\n

\n

\ud83d\udccb Actionable Steps: Certificate Verification<\/h4>\n